Archive for Washington Post

Warning: Language

Posted in Culture, Media, Politics with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 29, 2009 by thedoyle

I got the title from an old Far Side cartoon, but looking around I wasn’t able to find a copy and also probably not a good idea if I infringe on the copyright. But today’s topic is about language.

Until we evolve into a higher order and are able to communicate telepathically we are stuck with verbal and written communication. I am constantly amazed at the sloppy language used everyday by people. Even going through law school I was amazed at the sloppy language used by my fellow students. I don’t mean the occasional typo, spoonerism, sarcastic or hyperbolic remark or slip of the tongue, Freudian or otherwise. I mean sloppy word choice, such as “no one believes that”, a phrase like that is easy to disprove and the speaker or writer should know better. It is often easy to spot when a speaker (I will use speaker for both verbal and written from here on…too lazy to write speaker or writer every time) just threw up a word rather than carefully thought it out vs. one who may have misspoke, usually in the latter case the speaker will correct themselves. In normal conversations between friends it may not be as important to the participants in the discussion, friends will often overlook such sloppiness because they will understand the meaning the speaker was actually trying to convey.

However, worse than sloppiness is when language is purposefully distorted and used to attack. Recently the Washington Post and the Associated Press attacked James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles, the journalists who exposed ACORN as the corrupt organization it really is. The Post falsely attributed a quote to O’Keefe making it appear that O’Keefe had a racial motivation. Scott Johnson of Powerline noticed it right away and demanded a response. Johnson followed up by pointing out that another blogger, John Rosenberg, had noticed a pattern by the Post author and also that Joel Mowbray had looked into the “drive-by mugging” of O’Keefe.

The Post did print a “correction” that’s actually a non-correction and Mr. Johnson notices the odd wording of the “correction”. Johnson links to a great article which blasts the Post for continuing to slime while pretending to correct.

I bring all of this up because the Post’s original article and its subsequent “correction” are an indicator of how the Left uses language to its advantage to slant any discussion their way and slime anyone who disagrees with them. The Left of course has no problem with this at all, which is why they go into fits about Sarah Palin using the phrase “death panels” on Facebook to describe panels that would have the authority to choose who may get life saving treatment but they don’t make a peep over a National Paper falsely putting racist words in the mouths of an opponent.

Lloyd Marcus at American Thinker has had enough. His article is entitled “Stop Allowing the Left to Set the Rules” and it s a great piece about how this sort of thing happens all the time and how especially now with all of the racism charges being thrown around by the left it must be combated. He also notes the cries for “civility” by the very same people who ignored or encouraged such incivility towards George W. Bush and Sarah Palin.

I have pointed out the hypocrisy of Liberals about this subject before. I could make every post every day on this blog about another example of it. Mr. Marcus is correct we need to be aware of the language used by the Left. It can’t be put down to pure sloppy thinking (although that is another problem the Left does have), most of the time it is well thought out to do the maximum amount of damage. By pointing out the Left’s tactics and hypocrisy and making sure our own language is direct we can defeat these nitwits.

That being said, I have no plans to stop being a sarcastic S.O.B.

Advertisements

Liberal Selective Hearing

Posted in Culture, Economy, Politics with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on March 10, 2009 by thedoyle

Liberals, I have found, don’t believe in many things.

They don’t believe in terrorists http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1531304-1,00.html http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/19/todays-helen-thomas-moment/

They don’t believe in the 2nd Amendment http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/26/AR2008062601755.html  http://www.slate.com/id/2193813/entry/2194311/ http://www.dcwatch.com/issues/gun080626e.htm

And apparently they don’t believe in hearing what people actually say to them.

For instance, look at the illegal immigration. If you tell a liberal that you are against illegal immigration, they will ask why you don’t like immigrants. They don’t hear the first word…(“ILLEGAL”) <—-Alice’s Restaurant Reference, who got it? They wonder why you are racist to dislike immigrants, they preach at you that this is a nation of immigrants. They are unable to process the idea that someone could like immigration and yet dislike illegal immigration.

So maybe it isn’t a hearing issue, maybe its how their brains process what they hear. Could liberals be brain damaged? We’ll leave that one alone for now.

So let’s talk about a recent bruhaha over Rush’s statements. I don’t listen to Rush because I don’t listen to any talk radio, if I did I would probably listen to him but its a moot point. That being said I am neutral towards Rush, but the reaction to his statements make clear Liberals selective hearing. Rush has clearly said Obama’s policies will damage the country and that he wants the policies to fail so that country does not. He was explicit about that but I watched the news after he said them and they completely ignored that and said Rush wants the country to fail. Some even edited his words to leave out where Rush explained the difference in wanting Obama to fail because Obama failing would be good for the country to make it seem as tho Rush wanted the country to fail.

This is typical of Liberals. Dishonest, disingenuous, deceptive. Maybe it is a brain condition after all.